The world trouble with 99% of the population is that... from the beggar to the UN.... So there is a lot of consulting opportunity on that matter and that is dvd's job....sharing which can also mean many things..... Robin hood taking from sheriff to distribute to the poor.....adopting and supporting poor children, ........ giving sweets away, i.e. our money to charity...... Community is the word. In community living we share alike but it has its weaknesses like unmotivating individualism therefore suppress inspiration which blocks creativity because individualism requires incentive and if one cannot increase equity then the motivation is lacking unless lots of us are born to give ...... But that is not the real world where people want to acquire, rule, conquer and display their wares.... That is the drive. that is why in most part of west, there is freedom of individualism to express, invent, create, propagate
SO communism has its good and the less good (not bad)…
Communism is called for in china and Mao did a great job because he saw china going to pieces and the poor became poorer and foreigners were grabbing china like the Manchu, Japanese, Europeans, British and all trying to colonize china. If china wasn't such a huge country, it would have been swallowed. On top of that there were locals leveraging on those foreigners for their own equity. The British tried to destroy china by intoxicating 1/5 of the world with opium
So Mao bite the bullet and many followed. was amassing huge debts and Chinese were humiliated. So Mao shut the door from 49 till late 75 or thereabout. That blackout period was good. It restored family and society values and brought in community living and patriotism. on the technology front china forwent innovation etc. but now it had to leapfrog e.g. from twisted copper pair to 7 micro satellites therefore bypassing fiber optics, and that was a huge national savings. ....... from telex to internet...and now its the world's largest netizen by 2008, from no export to now the world's factory warehouse. ...... but leapfrogging has its pains as social values are once again unchecked and had not progressed as much as its economic powerhouse status..... President Hu has begun bringing that back more of that by spreading out development into the hinterland of the 900m ppl in agriculture, and enriching lives outside the rich coastal cities..... and on that score...the brand of china communism has progressed into socialism for the people and country... now had the presidents of US think about spreading of wealth, there may be less poor but it would also mean not inspiring world class leaders like BGates, WarrenB, SJobs, Flanigal, MFriedman, Juran, etc etc. During these 50 years US has produced more of these people than the world put together. It provided a platform for individualism but the platform also brought tore down family values.... perhaps its time for a new brand of government but that can only rise from the people.

Recent Comments